Our firm actively represents class representatives in complicated class actions at the Provincial and Federal level with particular emphasis in areas of securities legislation. We represent investors and consumers who have suffered losses as a result of the fault, negligence or want of skill of corporations, brokers and financial institutions.

Virginia Nelles vs. Royal Bank of Canada

Notice of Final Judgment
April 13, 2012

CNW Notice of Final Judgment
April 13, 2012

Judgment and procès-verbal d’audience of The Honourable Robert Mongeon, J.C.S.
March 14, 2012

Notice of Fairness Hearing
March 6, 2012

Settlement Agreement and Transaction
March 5, 2012

Order of the Honourable Robert Mongeon, J.C.S. granting delay to inscribe the case to March 16, 2012
December 19, 2011

Reasons for Judgment Rendered Verbally on October 6, 2011, Justice Robert Mongeon, J.C.S.
October 24, 2011

Defendant's Motion for Permission to Examine Members of the Class After Plea.
September 8, 2011

Agreement as to Conduct of the Proceedings as of August 19, 2011. (Signed by Stein & Stein Inc. on August 19, 2011 and Borden Ladner Gervais on August 24, 2011)
August 19, 2011

Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Delay to Inscribe Case within Peremptory Time Limit (with proposed new proceedings schedule)
August 19, 2011

Plea of Defendant, Royal Bank of Canada.
August 18, 2011

Extension of delay to inscribe postponed to August 25, 2011 received from Justice Robert Mongeon by e-mail.
July 8, 2011

Affidavit of Virginia Nelles in Response to Certain Questions Objected to During Examination on Discovery.
July 7, 2011

Judgment of the Court of Appeal, The Honourable Pierre J. Dalphond, J.A.
June 29, 2011

Transcript of Reasons for Judgment (on Defendant's Motion for Permission to Examine Members of the Class before Plea) Given Orally on May 25, 2011 under the Presidency of the Honourable Robert Mongeon, J.C.S.
May 25, 2011

Plaintiff's Outline of Argument Regarding RBC's Motion to Examine Class Members on Discovery.
May 25, 2011

Procès-verbal, Justice Robert Mongeon, J.C.S.
May 12, 2011

Defendant's Notice of Filing of Depositions.
May 11, 2011.

Defendant's Motion for Permission to Examine Members of the Class before Plea.
May 11, 2011

Proces-verbal of The Honourable Mr. Justice Robert Mongeon, J.C.S.
February 14, 2011

Motion to Extend Delay to Inscribe Case Within Peremptory Time Limit
February 10, 2011

Amended Motion Introductive of Class Action Proceedings
October 27, 2010

Defendant's Particularized Motion to Dismiss Action
October 15, 2010

Defendant's Notice of Disclosure of Preliminary Exceptions
September 10, 2010

Motion Introductive of Class Action Proceedings
August 17, 2010

Agreement as to the Conduct of Proceedings
July 16, 2010

Notice to members
July 14, 2010

Judgment concerning motion for authorization
July 14, 2010

Motion for Authorization to Institute a Class Action and to Obtain the Status of Representative February 5, 2010

Mark Rabinovitch v. CIBC Asset Management Inc.

CASE SUMMARY

In October 1996, the Atlas American RSP Index Fund was created and Atlas Asset Management was the mutual fund administrator. One of the fundamental objectives of the Fund was to enable Canadian investors to invest Canadian money based on the performance of U.S. stock indexes without assuming the normal U.S. dollar currency risk. The fund was designed to allow the Canadian money invested to appreciate or decline in value by the same percentage as certain U.S. stock indexes, irrespective of any fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. and Canadian dollars.

The fundamental objectives of the fund were defined by the Trust Agreement under which it was created. Canadian securities legislation and the National Instrument and Companion Policy (issued and adopted in regard to Mutual Funds pursuant to the legislation and to the prospectus issued by the Fund administrator) stated that the fundamental objectives of the fund could not be changed without the prior approval of the investors by way of a majority vote at a duly called meeting of investors.

From October 1996 until early 2002, the Canadian money invested in the fund in fact rose and fell in value in accordance with the U.S. stock indexes being tracked by the fund - notwithstanding that there were significant fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar at various times over this period.

The fund became known as the Renaissance U.S. RSP Index fund in early 2002 and CIBC took over as the mutual fund administrator. At this time, there were approximately 36,000 Canadians with their retirement savings invested in the fund. At no time did CIBC file a material change notice disclosing a change to any fundamental feature of the Fund, and at no time did CIBC seek the approval of investors to make a change to a fundamental objective of the fund.

From the time CIBC began administrating the Fund until November 21, 2003, the U.S. dollar decreased by approximately 18% relative to the Canadian dollar. Such fluctuation in the exchange rate had not affected the value of the investments in the fund in the past as the fund was designed to virtually eliminate currency risk. However, over that period of time the Canadian money invested in the fund underperformed the U.S. stock indexes tracked by the fund by approximately 18% - matching the fluctuation in the exchange rate. This translated into a collective loss of more than $22 million dollars for 36,000 Canadian investors and their retirement savings.

On November 21, 2003, Mark Rabinovitch filed a motion asking that he be authorized to act on behalf of all the fund's investors in a class action against CIBC. His motion was granted and none of the 36,000 investors opted out of the class action. Further to the Authorization Judgment, Mr. Rabinovitch instituted a class action alleging that:

i.CIBC added U.S. dollar currency risk as a risk factor for Canadian money invested in the fund;

ii.By adding U.S. dollar currency risk, CIBC significantly changed a fundamental objective and feature of the fund;

iii.CIBC did not notify the 36,000 investors that it would be adding U.S. dollar currency risk and did not obtain the investors’ approval for the significant change;

iv.CIBC committed a fault by adding U.S. dollar currency risk as a risk factor for the fund in the manner that it did;

v.Due to CIBC’s failure to notify investors of the significant change, the illegally added U.S. dollar currency risk only became public on November 21, 2003 when Mr. Rabinovitch made his Motion for Authorization;

vi.As a result of the fault – the addition of the U.S. dollar currency risk – the investments of the 36,000 investors of the fund decreased in value by more than $22 million dollars by the time the U.S. dollar currency risk became public.

The action was settled on December 17, 2007 for the sum of 20 million dollars Canadian.

To read more about this case please follow the proceedings included in the Litigation section.

The Litigation

[ Download Adobe Acrobat Reader ]

Judgment Approving Memorandum of Agreement of Amendment 21 February 2008

Memorandum of Agreement of Amendment 20 February 2008

Notice of Final Judgment December 2007

Notice to Unit Holders December 2007

Final Judgment 17 December 2007

Motion to approve a class action settlement agreement and transaction (C.S.) 11 December 2007

Settlement Agreement 10 December 2007

Proof of Claim form

Declaration of Inscription on the Roll for Hearing (C.S.) 28 September 2006

CIBC Asset Management Inc. v. Rabinovitch (C.A.) 16 June 2006

Declaration of Inscription on the Roll for Hearing (C.S.) 24 May 2006

CIBC Asset Management Inc. v. Rabinovitch (C.A.) 22 February 2006

Defendant's Plea (C.S.) 3 June 2005

CIBC Asset Management Inc. v. Rabinovitch (C.A.) 11 March 2005

Rabinovitch v. CIBC Asset Management Inc. (C.S.) 3 December 2004

Re-amended motion introductive of class action (C.S.) 27 September 2004

CIBC Asset Management Inc. v. Mark Rabinovitch (C.A.) 2 September 2004

CIBC Asset Management Inc. v. Rabinovitch (C.A.) 24 August 2004

Rabinovitch v. CIBC Asset Management Inc. (C.S.) 15 July 2004

Rectified Judgment Granting a Motion for Authorization to Institute a Class Action (C.S.) 11 March 2004

Notice to Members (8 March 2004)

Judgment Granting a Motion for Authorization to Institute a Class Action (C.S.) 23 February 2004

Motion for authorization to institute a class action and to obtain the status of representative (C.S.) - 21 November 2003

Contact
You may contact counsel representing members of the Class in these actions.

Neil Stein
Stein & Stein Inc.
4101 Sherbrooke St. West
Montreal, Quebec
Canada H3Z 1A7
Tel: 514 866 9806
Ext. 209

Robert Kugler
Kugler Kandestin, L.L.P.
1 Place Ville Marie
Suite 2101
Montreal, Quebec
Canada H3B 2C6
Tel: 514 878 2861